There were conflicting reports about the TDS on the arrears to be paid to central government employees as a result of the implementation of the sixth pay commission.
The department of income tax has made clarifications.
|
|
The salary of central government employees has been increased as per the recommendation of the sixth pay commission. This pay hike is effective from 1st January, 2006. |
This means that all the government employees would be receiving huge arrears.
(Are you a government servant who would be receiving arrears? Utilize it wisely to improve your financial health instead of splurging. Please read “Don’t blow away a windfall – Smart ways to spend your bonus and arrears” for more)
Since this means there is a huge liability on the government, it has decided to give the arrear amount in two parts: 40% of the amount would be paid out this year, and the remaining 60% amount would be paid out next year.
This had resulted in huge confusion about the income tax treatment of these arrears: Would the employees be required to pay income tax for this year only on the 40% of the arrear amount that would be disbursed this year, or they need to pay the tax on the full amount, although 60% of it would be paid next year?
The income tax department has clarified through a circular that the tax liability for this year would be only on the arrear amount that is actually paid out.
Thus, the government would cut the tax deducted at source (TDS) only for the 40% amount paid out this year.
The TDS would be applied on the remaining 60% amount next year, when that amount is actually paid.
Other articles you might be interested in:
- An introduction to Technical Analysis
- Retirement money: How to invest, where to invest
- Do you have an SIP? Don’t stop it!
- Indian banks hike FCNR, NRE deposit rates
- Renting vs Buying: To buy a house or rent it?
- RBI proposes drastic reduction in clearing charges for outstation cheques
- Definition of Residential Statuses: Resident, RNOR, NRI, PIO
- An Introduction to Islamic or Shariah Compliant Banking
- Early retirement – Why a fixed deposit (FD) is not a good choice
- Permanent Account Number (PAN) for an NRI and a PIO
- You are 30 – Think of 50: Impact of inflation on your budget
- An Introduction to Reverse Mortgage
| Can you achieve all your financial goals? | |
 |
Check out my comprehensive Financial Planning Service – I would do a complete analysis of your personal finances, and help you achieve all your financial goals. Click here for more details. |
| You can also have a look at all my products at the Personal Finance Products and Services Store. | |
Loading ...
48 
3 
111
if 40% arrears are not paid during the financial year 2008-2009, whether the tax liability for 40% is to be paid in this year only or not. please clarify.
Hi,
Tax is payable on any income that is paid to you or is due to you, whichever is earlier.
Since the 40% arrears are sue to you in 2008-09, the amount would be taxable even if it is not actually paid out to you.
However, I believe the this amount is to be actually paid out in 2008-09 (that is, before March 31st 2009). So, there should not be any confusion.
Moreover, if the government fails to pay this amount, it might come out with a clarification about the taxation of such unpaid amount.
will Arrear basic add for hra rebate of non paid hra?
Hi Sushil,
I am not sure if I understand your question correctly.
If you are asking if an increased HRA exemption can be claimed as a result of increase in basic for the previous years (say due to retrospective hike in salary), then yes, it can be done.